Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Ciencias Sociales. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Ciencias Sociales. Mostrar todas las entradas
lunes, 18 de enero de 2010
Echando una mano a los haitianos.
Por desgracia, la educación suele reducirse demasiado a menudo a lo meramente académico. Se interpreta como la transmisión de conocimientos relativos a una serie de disciplinas que nuestras sociedades consideran vitales para desempeñarse en ellas como adultos, y poco más. Sin embargo, la educación integral (esto es, la educación auténtica) no tiene más remedio que incluir la transmisión de valores éticos. Por eso, aprovechando (no se me ocurría otro término) los desgraciados incidentes recientemente acaecidos en Haití, Leslie y yo pensamos que era el momento oportuno de introducir a los niños a la idea de contribuir a una causa justa y echar una mano a los más necesitados. Así pues, les hablamos un poco sobre la situación política, económica y social del país, dónde se encuentra geográficamente, y les mostramos unas imágenes publicadas por la revista Time sobre el terremoto que ha asolado la capital antes de conectarnos al web de la Cruz Roja española para hacer una modesta contribución económica.
Etiquetas:
Ciencias Sociales,
Ética,
solidaridad
miércoles, 23 de diciembre de 2009
Religiosity & social inequality.
BBC 4 has a great discussion program called Thinking Allowed that focuses on the latest social research and where plenty of interesting topics usually pop up. I subscribed to their podcast, and recently listened to a discussion on the relation between religiosity and social inequality (MP3 format) that could be, I thought, valuable to the kids. While I suppose it's not a very politically correct issue to bring up, the fact is that social research clearly proves that those countries where social inequaity is higher tend to be more religious, while societies that have managed to somehow bridge the social gap tend to be more secular. Again, one could like or dislike the findings, but that still doesn't change the facts.
Said that, the problem is, of course, how to interpret those results. Does this vindicate Marx, who famously stated that religion is "the opium of the people"? Why does this relationship even exist? Is it because poor people, especially those who live in a society where other people clearly enjoy a large amount of wealth, need some sort of belief to alleviate their pain? Or, on the other hand, is it something promoted by the wealthy elite, to subjugate and control the less fortunate in their societies? And how do we explain, then, that the wealthy also clearly believe in these supernatural explanations? They obviously have no need to be controlled and subjugated. Even better, is it that higher social inequality leads to more religiosity, or that more religiosity leads to higher social inequality? Which is the cause and which the effect? Or perhaps they are both dependent on a third factor that could cause them both?
These are some of the issues we discussed after listening to the short (about 15-20 minutes) conversation from Thinking Allowed. Basically, my intention wasn't so much to find an answer to the above questions as to teach the kids that social issues are always far more complex than one may think at first glance. The problem is not so much identifying the facts and measuring them as isolating their probable causes.
Said that, the problem is, of course, how to interpret those results. Does this vindicate Marx, who famously stated that religion is "the opium of the people"? Why does this relationship even exist? Is it because poor people, especially those who live in a society where other people clearly enjoy a large amount of wealth, need some sort of belief to alleviate their pain? Or, on the other hand, is it something promoted by the wealthy elite, to subjugate and control the less fortunate in their societies? And how do we explain, then, that the wealthy also clearly believe in these supernatural explanations? They obviously have no need to be controlled and subjugated. Even better, is it that higher social inequality leads to more religiosity, or that more religiosity leads to higher social inequality? Which is the cause and which the effect? Or perhaps they are both dependent on a third factor that could cause them both?
These are some of the issues we discussed after listening to the short (about 15-20 minutes) conversation from Thinking Allowed. Basically, my intention wasn't so much to find an answer to the above questions as to teach the kids that social issues are always far more complex than one may think at first glance. The problem is not so much identifying the facts and measuring them as isolating their probable causes.
Etiquetas:
Ciencias Sociales,
Historia de las religiones,
Religion
viernes, 4 de diciembre de 2009
Virtual visit to Stonehenge & Pompeii.
One of the advantages of modern technology is to allow virtual visits to remote sites, which can be used to reinforce certain concepts. In our case, we "visited" the ruins of Pompeii and Stonehenge, which we couldn't visit last time we traveled to the UK. First of all, here is a short video about the grandeur and decline of Pompeii:
Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the video are also available on YouTube.
But, even cooler, you can use Google Street Map to walk around the ruins of Pompeii:
View Larger Map
As for Stonehenge, here is also your port to the place:
View Larger Map
Enjoy!
Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the video are also available on YouTube.
But, even cooler, you can use Google Street Map to walk around the ruins of Pompeii:
View Larger Map
As for Stonehenge, here is also your port to the place:
View Larger Map
Enjoy!
Etiquetas:
Ciencias Sociales,
Historia,
Pompeii,
Prehistory,
Roman Empire,
Stonehenge
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)
